IHB OpenIR  > 学位论文
Alternative TitleMolecular Phylogeny of Several Ciliates
Thesis Advisor余育和
Degree Grantor中国科学院水生生物研究所
Place of Conferral中国科学院水生生物研究所
Degree Discipline水生生物学
Keyword分子进化 Ssu Rrna基因 协同进化 分类 车轮虫 小车轮虫 半眉虫 喇叭虫 棘尾虫 吸管虫
Other AbstractPhylum Ciliophora is monophyly, and there are more than 10,000 species of ciliates in the literatures so far. Even after many times of modification on the classification of phylum Ciliophora by the observations on morphology, morphogenesis and ultrastructure, there are still arguments on many taxa. In this study, we developed novel methods to collect and treat samples which have different living habits and environments, and studied on phylogeny of ciliates by analyzing the sequences of Small Subunit Ribosome RNA (SSU rRNA) genes. We sequenced the SSU rRNA genes of 9 ciliates in 6 genus in this study. Among these species, there is no literature on the study of sequence and molecular evolution for 7 of them. After analyzing the phylogenetic tree and comparing the results with the characteristic in morphology and taxonomy, we have following conclusions: 1) Because of the coevolution in trichodinids, there are obvious difference between order Mobilida and order Sessilida in phylogenetic tree. The peritrichs is probably not monophyly. Due to the similar effect from coevolution with hosts on Hemiophrys macrostoma, there are deviations in the phylogeny for Hemiophrys macrostoma and Hemiophrys procera. It was found that class Litostomatea which Hemiophrys is belong to is not in the same clade with class Prostomatea in the phylogenetic tree,which confirms the change to remove the class Prostomatea from the subphylum including these two classes. The two characteristics of Stentor, having pigment granules and symbiotic Chlorella is apomorphic character, but not plesiomorphic character. There is well-fit ordination in evolution in gene level and the behavior level for budding reproduction of Suctoria. The possible evolution path for budding reproduction is: exogenous budding → endogenous budding → evaginogenous budding. 6) There is no obvious difference between Oxytricha and Stylonychia in both sequence and morphology. So there is no enough evidence for establishing these two genera. In addition, we found that the results from the morphological taxonomy and molecular phylogeny study fit each other, though there are some exceptions. The exceptions might be caused by the possibility that the same name is given to actually different species. So we suggest that morphology and molecular characters to a type specie should be submitted in the report for further taxonomic and phylogenetic research.
Document Type学位论文
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
朱飞云. 多种纤毛虫分子系统学研究[D]. 中国科学院水生生物研究所. 中国科学院水生生物研究所,2002.
Files in This Item:
File Name/Size DocType Version Access License
多种纤毛虫分子系统学研究.pdf(3874KB) 限制开放--Application Full Text
Related Services
Recommend this item
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[朱飞云]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[朱飞云]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[朱飞云]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.